How do we prepare teachers to be good at their jobs and stay in the profession long enough to really make an impact? This is the zillion dollar question.
Alternative certification programs, most prominently represented in the media by Teach For America, recruit altruistic-minded applicants and throw them into the toughest classes with barely a summer of preparation. I was a New York City Teaching Fellow (cohort 6) and the trial by fire model prematurely pushes out a lot of would-be great teachers.
Teacher education schools can offer training in education theory and practice, featuring the highly valuable student teaching component. The opportunities afforded by site visits and student teaching— to get a feel for the preparation, personalities, logistics, execution, failures, and successes of life in the classroom— are invaluable. There’s a steep learning curve in becoming a strong teacher, and the more quality time one spends in a living classroom before it’s all his or her responsibility is golden. Unfortunately, many good graduate programs in teacher education are cost-prohibitive. Would-teachers who want to get good preparation can’t sustain the amount of debt or the interruption of income. Instead they never become teachers or opt for the alternative certification meat-grinder.
There is a third way: the Urban Teacher Residency. Non-teachers apply to be Residents. If accepted, they basically spend a year— paid, not in debt— as apprentice-teachers and students of the craft— and then commit to teaching for at least 3 years in the district that they trained in.
From the URTU (Urban Teacher Residency United) website: 85% of all Residency graduates stay in their schools beyond those crucial first three years, reducing the high teacher turnover rates that cost districts millions and leave students in the dark.
The URTU formed in 2007. The model received national attention from a deeply researched and highly readable 2008 report by the Center for Teaching Quality and the Aspen Institute.
In the short term, it’s expensive to pay people to learn the job for a year. In the long run, well-prepared teachers stay, accumulate expertise, and become truly highly effective at getting the best out of students. If this model works as well as it seems to, why does it seem like no one is talking about it?

Hi Dan,
Thanks for the shout out to urban teacher residency programs! As a mentor-resident coach for the Academy for Urban School Leadership (Chicago), I work with amazing resident and mentor teachers who are committed to their students and to teaching. We stress the importance of developing relationships with students and families. As we know these are relationships that take time to build, and two years doesn't cut it. I continue to be frustrated with the attention that TFA receives. Their work promotes the notion that a lack of preparation is adequate for serving our students who need the best prepared teachers. Further, they promote the revolving door of teachers through our schools that would be better served by a stable cadre of committed adults. I appreciate you using this space to promote a "third way".
Best,
Carrie Kamm
Posted by: Carriejk | 03/10/2011 at 09:11 PM
Hi Dan,
I echo Carrie's shout out to UTRs. I also wanted to let you know that UTRU is hosting its first policy convening on March 14th and 15th which will bring together the nation's leading UTR programs. More information can be found on our website. http://www.utrunited.org/blog/entry/senator-michael-bennet-speaks-at-capitol-hill-briefing-on-urban-teacher-res/
Please let us know if you have further questions or need additional information.
Take care,
Sonia Mathew
Posted by: Sonia Mathew | 03/11/2011 at 11:31 AM
Dan - I've been wondering the same thing myself recently - I actually just ended a series on turnover at my school pointing towards this model as a possible solution. The Center for Inspired Teaching runs a similar program in your neck of the woods, you should check them out.
Posted by: Stephen | 03/11/2011 at 11:41 AM
Sonia & Carrie,
Thanks for commenting! I will check into the DC policy discussion and Center for Inspired Teaching program. I appreciate the info!
-DAN
Posted by: DanBrown | 03/12/2011 at 03:26 PM
I am very interested in this sphere and reading this post I have known many new things, which I have not known before. Thanks for publishing this great article here.
Posted by: freelance writer | 12/22/2011 at 09:20 AM
Yeah it’s a great idea of keeping them in track and justifies their teaching ability skills and many more. It will also make teaching staff in making to know new things and establish the innovative things to their students. Hope it will greatly succeed.
Posted by: ski instructor courses | 01/19/2012 at 11:09 AM