Five years ago, I joined the Teacher Leaders Network, then a listserve where conversations between accomplished teachers across the nation were conducted through emails. The term teacher leader was new to me. I remember one of the very first conversation threads I read through with keen interest was on the question someone posed: What is teacher leadership? The teachers had a amazing things to say about the potential of teachers to change the course of education for the better. TLN'ers mentioned the text Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop As Leaders, which was one of the only books out about teacher leadership and its huge, untapped potential. I was working in a school where there were almost no formal teacher leadership roles, and change most often came in the form of mandates from the district.
Five years later, the landscape I see in New York City schools and in many other states where I have teacher friends and colleagues is abundant with leadership opportunities for teachers. The various roles exist at the school level (including entirely teacher-led schools), through outside organizations such as Center For Teaching Quality, teacher preparation schools, and to a lesser extent at district and state levels, though the US DOE is in its fourth year of employing both part time and full time teaching ambassadors now.
In the last five years, I've personally had the opportunity to try out many teacher leadership roles, from grade team leader, department chair, action researcher, and cooperating teacher, to edublogger, coauthor of Teaching 2030, speaker at education policy conferences, presenter at curriculum workshops, and curriculum consultant. That's a lot, and this has been possible because of the years of work of progressive organizations like CTQ, progressive school leaders and policy makers, and most of all actual teacher leaders who helped pave the way.
The sea change toward teacher leadership is worthy of pause and celebration. Teacher leadership is not a foreign concept anymore. It's (almost) expected that schools provide leadership opportunities for teachers.
So, where are we now? Our work--on this large a scale--is still in its infancy. What are teacher leaders doing and what impact are we having? Does the answer to that question vary as much as our classroom teaching does? What kind of leaders are we and what is our function? Do we have the resources we need to be effective leaders? Toward what are we leading? Does that depend entirely on our context or do teacher leaders have common goals?

Ariel- I hope you come to the Mitchell 20 premiere on Nov 3rd in NYC. Sponsored by NYSUT and UFT Teacher Center
Annette
Posted by: Annette Romano | October 31, 2011 at 09:06 PM
Yes, it is important to think about "toward what are we leading?" At our school, teachers brainstormed what they thought would be best for students. We then looked at research and found ideas that we could use in the transformation of our school. I feel as though there are many new corporations developing to take advantage of monetary opportunities in education, and teachers need to beware of quick fixes. Many times these are tied to politics. At our school we are steadfastly resisting packaged answers, because we feel we have the best interests of our students in mind, unlike many government and political entities. It was a rude awakening to us to find out that deals were being made behind the scenes involving selling out our students (and teachers.) I would advise others: "Keep your eyes wide open and do not make hasty teacher-leadership decisions. Always keep the sacred trust of your students' best interests at the forefront of your leadership decisions." We won't sell out our vision for our students, nor will we sell out the teachers who trust us to build their vision for change at our school. We will choose our partnerships carefully.
Posted by: Joetta Schneider | November 01, 2011 at 05:56 AM
i agree!!! really helps a lot :D
Posted by: freelance writing | November 15, 2011 at 01:08 PM