« Do Your Students Know How to Search with a Purpose? [slide] | Main | Crazy Talk on Control in Schools »

May 28, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c721253ef0154329abdaf970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why are we STILL Wasting Money on Whiteboards?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1065784140

Interactive Whiteboards can be a nightmare for subs. I vote for blackboards with chalk.

www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1065784140

Spend the money on Laptop computers so that the children have access to the Internet. One or two computers per classroom is useless.

Frank Noschese

Or you could buy 9,000 $2 interactive whiteboards -- one for each pair of students in your district. http://bit.ly/2dollarWB

Great post, as always!

IAppleLearner

Wow?! I couldn't agree with you more. Great points. He could have bought an iPad 2 for each classroom and covered his whiteboard thrill and then some but served the needs of five times as many teachers and every student in his school. How sad he was caught in a vendor trap and impulse buying.

Kevin Hodgson

Thanks for another great post to get us thinking.
Kevin

KDerushia

Wow...I have bought IWBs many times but never paid $3,000/ea. Educational funds are being misspent daily.

EdTechSandyK

Or 45 interactive slates which offer the same technology as stationary IWBs but don't tie the teacher (or students) to the front of the room AND depending on the brand allow for interactivity between teacher and student slates, as well as formative assessment options when integrated with a student response system. Anyone looking at IWB technology should check out eInstruction Mobis (I don't work for eInstruction, but I have used their products and feel they are very education centered and offer high quality integration options.)

Timeoutdad

Until teachers learn how to integrate the technology into their teaching and their students' learning, spending that 18 grand on other technology can still be a waste of money.

iPads, iPod touches, Livescribe pens, netbooks etc. sound awesome to have in the classroom, but if teachers don't know how to transform their teaching and students' learning with these devices, they can easily become expensive toys or dust collectors, rather than tools.

iPads, iPod touches, and netbooks lose much of their value if you don't have good WiFi in your building, especially if you want the students to access the internet with them.

The biggest problem is that we are spending before planning. It takes TIME to really think about how to use these devices for our students' learning.

If there is no active planning on how these things are to be used effectively, then we should buy BOOKS with them. No tech issues to deal with and lots of effective learning can still happen.

Joie

Well said, bold and realistic. I like it. If that was me I would use it to pay for students who are smart but their parents can't afford the tuition fees.

crazedmummy

I am so used to "you can have input, but we already decided" that this does not surprise me. The gap between the words "investigative learning" out of their mouths and the supported practice of silent rows of students in lectures or on fill-in-the blank worksheets (these are the "good classes") is so prevalent, I wonder whether administrators really understand what the words mean.
Sales of these devices should be covered by the same consumer protection, whereby if you sign up for anything at a conference you get to retract that agreement once you come to your senses.
Yay for Livescribe!!

Andy

I agree wholeheartedly with 'Timeoutdad.' It's not about the tools, it's about the connection you make WITH the tools (through proper training) and the ability to use them effectively with what you teach.

Are you arguing that IWB's are too costly or ineffective teaching tools? The former is certainly up for debate, but the latter is most definitely not. There are thousands of good teachers out there who have learned how to make connections with IWB's in delivering effective whole group instruction. Thousands more have taken it one step further and integrated formative assessment into those lessons via LRS devices for even greater gains in student achievement.

I've seen IWB's used as back drops for the morning announcements and I've seen a hundred broken laptops sitting in a tech's offoce a month after a 1-1 initiative was implemented. Fundamentally, it's not about the tools, it's about the teachers and the training.

D Mailloux

We bought on IWB this year, our first . As well we purchased 5 media carts, 5 projectors and 5 sets of laptop speakers for our middle school. The teachers all have laptops already to use with the purchased equipment. The rational wasfirst funds and the best use for the entire population of the school. Technology changes very fast and do we need to be consumers or educators with effective quality tools. It is a good lesson for the students to also see .

Bill Ferriter


Andy---in a comment that echoes the thinking of timeoutdad----wrote:

I agree wholeheartedly with Timeoutdad. Its not about the tools, its
about the connection you make WITH the tools (through proper training)
and the ability to use them effectively with what you teach.


Yall are preaching to the choir here, Andy and Time Out Dad. I couldnt agree more that spending technology monies without a clear vision for how those tools and services are going to support meaningful learning in your classroom. In fact, Ive written about that a bunch of times. Here are two specific posts:

Does YOUR School Have Technology Vision Statements?
http://bit.ly/fSXYAI

Making Good Technology Choices
http://bit.ly/gqeU7T

And thats one of the reasons Im so passionately opposed to Interactive Whiteboards. Nothing that Ive seen done with IWBs----or that I actually did with the IWB that I had in my classroom for a year as I wrote professional development courses for Promethean and Pearson----supports any of my own personal beliefs about what good teaching and learning looks like in action.

I think its important, Andy, to specify that many of the progressive teaching practices that people attribute to IWBs are really a result of peripherals that you can buy without ever investing in a $2,000 board. I have nothing against sets of student responders or the tablets and slates that IWB companies sell. They all support the kinds of teaching and learning practices that I believe it.

But the board itself should be dragged out of our buildings and burned! It promotes a vision of teacher-directed learning that needs to be shelved.

And Time Out Dad: Id support spending the $18 K that my buddys principal blew on IWBs on ANYTHING else. Books, tutoring, teacher professional development, field trips, OR technology. My central point is that IWBs are an irresponsible purchase and a waste of taxpayer cash.

This kind of unintelligent waste makes me want to join the Tea Party.

(I never thought Id actually say THAT!)

Any of this make sense?
Bill

LisaRead

I hear you....oh boy do I hear you.... We have 3 IWBs in our Middle School. One gets used a little. One gets used as a Movie Screen, and the 3rd gets used as a screen for the Overheads (no lie). For the cost of 2 of those boards, we could have gotten LCD projectors for every class. Drives me nuts. Several posts on my blog dedicated to the "Bright Shiny" philosophy.
http://readlisaread.edublogs.org/2010/11/06/smartboard-sure-smart-teaching-im-not-convinced/

Jessica

Bill (and everyone else who commented),
Thanks for providing a physical conversation that I am able to show to everyone in my school. I am the local "Bill Ferriter" in that I am outspoken against IWB where I am. We are considering some big IT purchases in the near future and I will definitely be showing all of these points to the admin before the purchases are made. Thanks for (hopefully) stopping another waste of money on IWB.

Bill Ferriter


Hey Jessie,

First, thanks for stopping by the Radical. Its good to see you here and Im glad that youre starting to question whether IWBs are a good use of your schools technology dollars. While they CAN be useful in the hands of a remarkable teacher, all too often, they become an expensive waste of limited dollars----and even in the best case scenario, they cost so much that they handcuff technology budgets, leaving schools with a limited number of devices during a time when we should be trying to get as many digital devices as possible into every classroom.

Id encourage you to poke through the Related Radical Reads listed at the end of the post. Theyre also great conversations about IWBs, too. Also, dont miss these two posts that are linked early in this article:

Wasting Money on Whiteboards
http://bit.ly/kesEFN

Examining Prometheans Recent Research on IWBs
http://bit.ly/jCCJcq

Hope this helps...and be sure to let me know if you have any other questions.

Rock on,
Bill

George Mayo

For $18,000 you could buy a rolling multi-media digital lab complete w/ ten Apple 250 GB Powerbooks, 5 digital video cameras & firewires, 5 digital cameras, tri-pods, and 5 USB Blue Snowball microphones. You would still have cash left to buy other items or sotfware as needed. Imagine the student output you could get in your school having one of these multi-media labs around for teachers to use.

Tammy Stephens

Some of the research I've been collecting supports this viewpoint. In one study it revealed the more constructivist a teacher was the less likely they were to use the Interactive Whiteboard provided to them. Teachers who used a more traditional transmission pedagogy were more likely to use their Interactive Whiteboard and had them predominately placed at the front of the room. I think one of the hard things about this tool is that it can be used to reinforce this type of pedagogy. Other data I've collected for other studies has shown that student proficiency with technology went down after a district heavily invested in Interactive Whiteboards as did student engagement over time.

I think an important question to be asking when evaluating the impact of Interactive Whiteboards is who is using it and for what purpose? Too often the answer is the teacher to disseminate information.

Peter Wilkinson

I love my interactive white board. We all see the same thing: its not me looking at my screen and putting something else on the board.

We Moodle, extemporize, and co-operate all on the WB. They will shout "down a bit, you're going too fast", or "send that page to the printer" or if totally frustrated with me rush up and say "give me the pen, it's like this ... [scribble scribble] ... now save that... " and we ALL get to see.

I can turn up at a lesson and the only thing I need to remember is my magic WB pen. Wouldn't be without one.

The clue is in the name: INTERACTIVE white board.

Bill Ferriter


Heres the thing, though, Peter: Theres nothing that you mention in your comment that you actually need an Interactive Whiteboard for.

While everything youve listed are reasonable instructional practices depending on the content that youre teaching and the current level of understanding of our students, the IWB is kind of like overkill. You could do all of that stuff with just a data projector----or maybe a data projector paired with a slate.

That would have saved your school about $2,000.

Does this make any sense?

Im not saying that youre not using the IWB in the right way---Im saying that youre using the IWB just like most people do.

More importantly, youre using the IWB in the way that it was designed to be used.

But that kind of proves my point: The work we generally do with IWBs can be done without IWBs for a fraction of the cost.

Bill Ferriter


Another great example, George!

Im going to spotlight it in its own post later this week. Heck, I might even consider starting a What would YOU do with $18 K? strand on my blog. That could be a lot of fun!

Good to see you and hope youre well....
Bill

Anonymous

This is the most ludicrous article. Schools that have the technology you mentioned aren't even using it correctly. IWBs are more important than the other technologies you mentioned... if teachers don't know how to properly use their IWB's, what makes you think they will know how to use other forms of technology?
The problem with handing devices to students is that the teacher has to manage the use of those devices…. I don't think teachers want to regulate the use of devices by their students when they can make their lessons interactive using an IWB. The IWB is the best investment because it impacts every student. Look at the research... IWB's do increase student achievement. It is an investment, but it is about time we invest in our youth.
If the IWB is not used properly, it is due to lack of teacher training... and subs? They are only there for a day or two…. plus there are free online training courses! Teachers expect their students to learn new things, and yet they aren’t willing to spend the time to learn how to use their IWB? Get with the 21st century!

Hatcherelli

Please do not misinterpret the intent of Bill's article. To me, he is venting because it seems that when we think about spending money on tech, the first thing that everyone thinks about is an IWB. He is simply letting us know that there are alternatives to the IWB.
If you have read Mr. Ferriter's articles in EL (and his books), you will find that he is definitely "with the 21st century" and he is a tech mentor to many of us, as well as to his students.

Mike Fisher

I'd *REALLY* be interested in seeing some of "Anonymous"'s research that is mentioned. (That wasn't paid for by Promethean or SMART...) I don't disagree that it's a great tool, but it's expensive, and many teachers "automate" with it--bolt it onto already archaic practices--but NOW WITH TECHNOLOGY! Woo Hoo! Not so good for kids.

Perhaps it would be great for Anonymous to know that teachers don't need to "regulate the devices!" The kids already have them in their pockets--the school just has to give permission for their use. (Anon-I'm talking about their cell phones--just so you're clear.)

Also of note--I really like how preachy anonymous folks can get! Little slice of awesome.

Ove Christensen

I see, there's not need for me to comment on your post in that most of us agree that iwbs have some build in pedagogical problems - teacher centering being just one of them.
The next big thing, however, may be interactive tables which once again will be restricting student activity in engaging with the outside world.
Go for mobile will be my suggestion and focus on student activities - not for tech. Go for the flexible solutions - not for fixed.
Best
Ove

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

  • Photo

    Bill Ferriter teaches 6th grade language arts in North Carolina, where he was named a Regional Teacher of the Year for 2005-2006.

    ABOUT

About this blog

  • The Teacher Leaders Network is a diverse community of accomplished teachers from across the United States. TLN is supported by the Center for Teaching Quality as part of its mission to cultivate teacher voice around important matters of education policy and teaching practice. The views expressed on this page are those of the individual author or authors and not necessarily the Center for Teaching Quality.