I've been reading Bob Marzano research studies for years, and while I don't always agree with the conclusions that he draws -- especially about the glory of the Interactive Whiteboard -- his work has helped to define the actions that I take in my classroom.
One Marzano finding -- more than any other -- is burned on my full-time classroom teacher's brain.
I whipped it into a slide this morning. Here it is:
(click to enlarge)
Think about that for a minute, y'all. If it's going to take 23 YEARS to adequately cover the standards in the K12 curriculum, we have some difficult choices to make.
We can EITHER add another 10 years to the time that our students spend in school OR we can start to make some critical decisions -- based on what we know about the kids in our community and the skills necessary to succeed in tomorrow's world -- about what we ARE and ARE NOT going to teach.
Which of those two choices are YOU prepared to make?
_______________________________________
Related Radical Reads:
How Guaranteed and Viable is YOUR Curriculum?
Brainpop and the Overloaded Curriculum
Any thoughts on whether the common core and draft next gen science standards make it better or worse?
Posted by: VocabularySpellingCity Mayor | September 22, 2012 at 08:41 AM