Another Student-Involved Assessment Experiment [ACTIVITY]

Last April, Dean Shareski -- a guy that I consider a mentor and a friend -- inadvertently lit a fire under my professional bee-hind with a bit titled Adventures in Assessment.  In it, Dean laid out a pretty simple challenge that I took to heart. 

He wrote:

"So I'm wondering if you're ready to let your students assess themselves. Not as some experiment where you end up grading them apart but where you really give the reigns over to them? If not, is it about trust? Is it about readiness? Fear?

I'm thinking that even 6 year olds should be able to assess themselves. If we give them the tools and expectations."

Since then, I've done a TON of reading about what Dean and assessment expert Rick Stiggins call "student involved assessment." 

Perhaps more importantly, I've tried a TON of different strategies for giving my students more chances to assess their learning.

My reasons are philosophical -- I really DO think that grades are far less important and practical than we make them out to be.  And don't take MY word for it:  Grant Wiggins calls grades an "utterly useless"  source of actionable feedback for ANYONE.  

My reasons are also practical -- I KNOW how important regular feedback on progress can be to building the confidence of learners, but I ALSO KNOW that there are TOO MANY students on my caseload for me to be the ONLY assessor providing feedback!

If my students are TRULY going to reflect daily on their progress towards mastering essential outcomes, they HAVE to become skilled at spotting trends in their OWN learning. 

So I've spent the past year tinkering with integrating opportunities for self-assessment into my classroom practice (see here and here). 

By and large, the experience has been a positive one.  I've learned that my students really CAN assess themselves accurately and really DO enjoy having regular opportunities to track their own progress and growth. 

Those results were pretty surprising, to be honest -- but they've left me looking to find MORE ways to integrate self-assessment into the work that I do with students.

This week, I tried a new Rick Stiggins inspired activity that was designed to help my kids reflect on the progress that they had made in our recent unit on energy. 

You can see it here:

Download 6. Handout_EnergyUnitAnalysisForm

Having just finished all of the lessons and assessments for our unit, I asked my students to look back over the tests that we took to spot patterns in their mastery. 

While it's not clearly detailed on the Unit Analysis form embedded above, I also asked them to confirm the patterns that they were spotting in the other assignments that we tackled during the unit.

Then, I asked my students to think about what they would tell their parents about their progress towards mastering the content covered in our unit. 

"What can you be proud of?" I prompted.  "What are you still working to master?  What in the patterns of progress that you are spotting has left you surprised?  Concerned?"

My goal is to eventually ask every student to fill out an analysis form at the end of every unit -- and then to prepare every student to actually HAVE conversations with their parents about the progress that they are making towards mastering the essential content in our curriculum.

So whaddya' think? 

Does this activity have any merit? 

What do you like about it?  What would you change about it? 

_____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

@shareski's Right: My Students CAN Assess Themselves

My Middle Schoolers LOVE Our Unit Overview Sheets

 

Comments

[Kristenswanson]

Bill, I've really enjoyed learning alongside you as you try out new forms of self assessment with your kids. John Hattie's research reminds us that student self assessment is the single most effective strategy for boosting student achievement. This makes logical sense because students who can provide themselves with feedback (whether a teacher is there or not) will improve more quickly. One question/thought/wish for the organizer: I wish the learning targets were linked to performances, not test questions. Thoughts on this?

[Twhitford]

Excellent post here Bill. I recall reading Dean's post about this a while back and I think I followed the conversation you two were having via twitter. If you, Dean and Mr. Stiggins are all supporting this same concept, then it is time for me to do a little research and see if I can get a couple of staff members to try it out. It makes a great deal of sense and I do recall John Hattie mentioning it, just like Kristen mentions above. Thanks for sharing your experiences with it and please keep us up to date on how it goes.

[Bill Ferriter]

No sweat, Tom...

Glad that the content resonates with you.

When you find those teachers, feel free to put them in touch with me. Im definitely convinced that this work is doable and productive -- and Id be more than happy to share what Ive learned with your peoples.

Rock on,
Bill

[ArielMargolis]

I really appreciate and support your position on student self-assessment. Giving out grades is not as meaningful to them as their truly understanding whether they mastered a skill or concept and what better way than to do a self-assessment. Looking at the self-assessment, it appears that students base their self-assessment on a test that they were administered. Is that the primary criterion used? If so, is your sense that that assessment is a good indicator of student mastery?